madeleine yates v. checkers drive-in restaurants, inc.

The defendants now move to dismiss Yates' complaint for failure to state a claim. and Vibes Media, LLC, alleging that the defendants violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by repeatedly sending her commercial advertisements via text message. The plaintiff, Madeleine Yates, brings this action against Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. Oblak, Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered, Richard Zachary Wolf, Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered & William James Quinn, Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP, pro hac vice. Bagg, Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP, pro hac vice, Katherine H. Vibes Media, LLC, Defendant, represented by Amy Elizabeth Richardson, Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP, pro hac vice, Basileios Katris, Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered, Jennifer P. Goldhaber, Hawkins, Parnell, Thackston & Young, LLP & Matthew Steven Dowling, Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP. Madeleine Yates, on behalf of herself and other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Roberto Luis Costales, Beaumont Costales, Jonathan Mille Kirkland, Beaumont Costales LLC & William Henry Beaumont, Beaumont Costales LLC.Ĭheckers Drive-in Restaurants, Inc., Defendant, represented by Abigail Marie Lyle, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Jarrett Lee Hale, Hunton & Williams Llp, Tara Leigh Elgie, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Catherine E.

Madeleine yates v. checkers drive-in restaurants, inc.